That's a very real challenge—moving from theory to practice. It's less about memorizing a list and more about internalizing the core human behaviors they describe. Many seasoned designers use a few practical tricks. First, they create a personal "cheat sheet" or set of Figma/Notion templates with bullet points for each relevant law (e.g., "Hick's Law: Reduce choices on this screen to speed up decision.") and refer to it during wireframe reviews. Second, they use the laws as a justification framework. In a critique, instead of saying "this feels cluttered," you can say, "Applying Hick's Law, presenting all 15 options at once will paralyze the user's decision-making; we should prioritize a progressive disclosure pattern." The key is to connect the law to a specific user action. For example, when placing a primary button, think "Fitts's Law" and ensure it's large and in a easily accessible zone. When organizing a dashboard, think "Miller's Law" and chunk information into groups of 5-9 items. It becomes a habit. To truly see how these laws interconnect and apply to real-world components and flows, I highly recommend this definitive guide on UX design laws. It doesn't just list them; it explains the psychology and provides clear application examples that help cement them in your workflow.
I've read about the classic UX laws—Fitts's, Hick's, Jakob's—and I understand them in theory. But when I'm in the middle of a complex design sprint, I struggle to actually apply them. They all start to blur together. How do experienced designers keep these principles top of mind and use them to make concrete design decisions or defend their choices in critiques? Is there a practical method or framework, or is it just pure memorization and experience?